Reviewer Qualifications
Review the proposed scholarly, professional, and methodological qualifications for the reviewer pool.
View Reviewer QualificationsCall for reviewers
Contribute to Peer Review at NEJSR
NEJSR welcomes researchers and experienced practitioners who can contribute subject-matter or evidence-synthesis expertise to peer review.
Why review
Support Rigorous Evidence Synthesis
Reviewers help editors evaluate the relevance, transparency, methodological quality, interpretation, and scholarly contribution of submitted evidence syntheses. Reviewer feedback should help authors strengthen their work while supporting sound editorial decisions.
Expertise sought
Areas of Expertise
- Management
- Project Management
- Organizational Studies
- Strategy
- Accounting
- Finance
- Operations
- Information Systems
- Human Resources
- Leadership
- Systematic Review Methods
- Meta-Analysis and Evidence Synthesis
Reviewer resources
Before You Apply
Reviewer Guidelines
Review the planned standards for constructive, confidential, timely, and ethically responsible peer review.
View Reviewer GuidelinesReviewer Responsibilities
Review expectations related to conflicts of interest, confidentiality, evidence assessment, and professional conduct.
View Reviewer ResponsibilitiesReviewer Recognition
Review the proposed ways NEJSR may recognize peer-review contributions.
View Reviewer RecognitionReview standards
Ethical and Professional Review
NEJSR reviewer guidance will align with recognized scholarly publishing ethics, including confidentiality, conflict disclosure, objective assessment, respectful feedback, and timely completion of accepted assignments.
Turnaround time pending approval
NEJSR will publish a standard review turnaround target before reviewer assignments begin. Each invitation will state the requested completion date so a reviewer can accept or decline the assignment with full information.